(network diagram of the lab)
My goal with replicating the simple MPLS network was to try to get a better understanding of how MPLS will work in NFV and 5G where there is a desire to do “network slicing.”
I’m not sure who wrote the initial blog post, but I am thankful they did because I was able to completely replicate it. I’m indebted to them because I feel like I now have a better understanding of Juniper and MPLS networks, which was my goal. This lab provides a base that I can build off of.
I don’t want to say much more in this blog post because I put a lot of work into the lab, so please take a look at the github repo where it resides.
Here’s a listing of all the virtual routers running an a baremetal KVM node.
$ virsh list Id Name State ---------------------------------------------------- 86 ce-ny running 120 pe-lo4 running 122 p2-njh running 123 p1-ny8 running 124 pe-nj2 running 125 ce-uk running
Here’s a session of ce-ny pinging/tracerouting ce-uk.
$ ssh root@ce-ny Password: --- JUNOS 17.3R1.10 built 2017-08-23 06:47:03 UTC root@ce-ny% root@ce-ny% cli root@ce-ny> ping 184.108.40.206 PING 220.127.116.11 (18.104.22.168): 56 data bytes 64 bytes from 22.214.171.124: icmp_seq=0 ttl=61 time=6.536 ms 64 bytes from 126.96.36.199: icmp_seq=1 ttl=61 time=3.840 ms ^C --- 188.8.131.52 ping statistics --- 2 packets transmitted, 2 packets received, 0% packet loss round-trip min/avg/max/stddev = 3.840/5.188/6.536/1.348 ms root@ce-ny> traceroute 184.108.40.206 traceroute to 220.127.116.11 (18.104.22.168), 30 hops max, 40 byte packets 1 10.3.5.0 (10.3.5.0) 4.759 ms 4.345 ms 4.514 ms 2 10.2.3.0 (10.2.3.0) 6.033 ms 6.077 ms 5.291 ms MPLS Label=299776 CoS=0 TTL=1 S=0 MPLS Label=299776 CoS=0 TTL=1 S=1 3 10.2.4.1 (10.2.4.1) 6.693 ms 6.012 ms 8.049 ms MPLS Label=299776 CoS=0 TTL=1 S=1 4 22.214.171.124 (126.96.36.199) 4.826 ms 5.409 ms 5.222 ms root@ce-ny>
It works! :)
NOTE: On the diagram each router has a .17x IP address (full address is the management network, 192.168.122.17x). The x for each is also their router ID and loopback address. So ce-uk, .176, is 188.8.131.52.
I’m really happy with how this worked out, and as mentioned, I now have a base to do more exploration around MPLS, BGP, OSPF and other protocols, hopefully ending with me having a good understanding of what network slicing could or should look like in a service provider.
One of the major things I learned is that building a virtual lab like this is really about understanding nodes and edges, just like what one would do with
graphviz dot diagrams. This is why I’ve listed the “links” (aka edges) and interfaces on the diagram, to help me automate and validate. Building a network diagram like the above should be completely automatable, based on well understood graphing. But that is another story… :)