I've been doing some research on "hardening" or securing workstations--I prefer to call desktops and laptops workstations--specifically OSX Mavericks.
When considering information security cryptography is extremely important. If you subscribe to the CIA triad (confidentiality, integrity, and availability), then cryptography can help with both the "C" and the "I."
Usually the randomness used in cryptography on workstations comes from /dev/random and /dev/urandom. On Linux /dev/random and /dev/urandom are different devices. If the entropy during cryptographic key creation is not high, then the resulting keys will not be as good.
When read, the /dev/random device will only return random bytes within the estimated number of bits of noise in the entropy pool. /dev/random should be suitable for uses that need very high quality randomness such as one-time pad or key generation. When the entropy pool is empty, reads from /dev/random will block until additional environmental noise is gathered. A read from the /dev/urandom device will not block waiting for more entropy. As a result, if there is not sufficient entropy in the entropy pool, the returned values are theoretically vulnerable to a cryptographic attack on the algorithms used by the driver. Knowledge of how to do this is not available in the current unclassified literature, but it is theoretically possible that such an attack may exist. If this is a concern in your application, use /dev/random instead. If you are unsure about whether you should use /dev/random or /dev/urandom, then probably you want to use the latter. As a general rule,/dev/urandom should be used for everything except long-lived GPG/SSL/SSH keys. NOTE: from man 4 random on Ubuntu 12.04 Precise
But on OSX they are essentially the same device, and don't use a hardware random number generator.
/dev/urandom is a compatibility nod to Linux. On Linux, /dev/urandom will produce lower quality output if the entropy pool drains, while /dev/random will prefer to block and wait for additional entropy to be collected. With Yarrow, this choice and distinction is not necessary, and the two devices behave identically. You may use either. NOTE: from man 4 random on OSX Mavericks
In fact, the devices use the Yarrow algorithm invented by Bruce Schneier and friends!
Yarrow is a PRNG; it generates cryptographically secure pseudo-random numbers on a computer. It can also be used as a real random number generator, accepting random inputs from analog random sources. We wrote Yarrow because after analyzing existing PRNGs and breaking our share of them, we wanted to build something secure.
So on one hand, it's slightly disappointing that my workstation doesn't have a hardware random number generator (despite the potential that hrngs have been polluted by various government agencies), but on the other the prng algorithm was created in part by a personal information security hero of mine, Bruce Schneier.